Carbon Accounting

All you need to know about carbon offsetting

Carbon offsets, carbon credits, carbon neutral, voluntary carbon… As the carbon market becomes more established, it also becomes more complex. This guide will clarify everything you need to know about offsetting and carbon credits in particular.

Forest

What is carbon offsetting?

Carbon offsetting is a term used to describe compensating for carbon emissions through the removal of carbon dioxide elsewhere. It is defined as a 'measurable, quantifiable, and trackable unit of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reductions'. 

Offsetting correctly and responsibly requires a rigorous plan to reduce emissions alongside purchasing carbon credits. Offsetting is a singular tool in an organisation’s toolkit of sustainability solutions and should not be used to compensate for emissions without any intention of reduction.

Carbon offsetting can be done by purchasing carbon credits, which represent the reduction or removal of one metric ton of carbon dioxide. These carbon credits can be bought from various organisations, such as third-party providers or governments, and are used to fund projects that aim to reduce or remove carbon emissions.

In Earthly’s view, when these carbon-removal projects are nature-based - reforestation for example - they tackle the dual crises of climate change and biodiversity loss. More on this below!

Carbon offsets vs carbon credits

Carbon offset and carbon credit are terms that are often used interchangeably but have distinct meanings.

Carbon offset refers to a reduction in carbon dioxide emissions made in one location to compensate for carbon emissions produced elsewhere. The idea behind carbon offsetting is to balance an individual's or organisation's carbon footprint by funding projects that remove an equivalent amount of carbon from the atmosphere. This can be achieved by investing in nature-based projects like reforestation or peatland restoration; clean energy projects such as carbon capture and storage; or even technology solutions like clean cookstoves and biochar.

On the other hand, a carbon credit is a tradable certificate or permit that represents the right to emit one metric ton of carbon dioxide or its equivalent. Carbon credits are used in emissions trading schemes, such as the European Union Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) and the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) in the United States, which set caps on the total amount of greenhouse gases that can be emitted by participating companies. These companies must then either reduce their emissions or purchase carbon credits from other companies that have reduced their emissions below their allocated limit.

In that sense, carbon offsetting is a way to balance one's carbon footprint by funding projects that remove carbon from the atmosphere. In contrast, carbon credits are a way to ‘trade’ the right to emit greenhouse gases. Both concepts aim to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and mitigate the impact of climate change, but the implementation and mechanism of each is different.

Mangroves in blue water
Mangroves roots in water

How does carbon offsetting work?

The offsetting process typically begins by measuring an individual or a company’s carbon footprint: the total amount of greenhouse gas emissions produced as a result of their operation. This can include emissions from manufacturing, transportation, energy use and waste. Businesses may also look to offset the footprint of a certain activity, product, team or process.

Once the carbon footprint has been determined, the individual or organisation can then purchase carbon credits.

It's essential to note that carbon offsetting is not a substitute for reducing emissions at the source. It should be used in combination with other strategies such as: using a sustainable supply chain, improved energy efficiency, using renewable energy, and achieving emissions and waste reduction. Complex, organisation-scale reduction strategies can take a long time to be realised. It’s encouraged that businesses invest in offsetting in the near-term while longer-term reduction plans are put in place.

It is also important to ensure the validity and quality of the carbon credits purchased. There are carbon credit certification bodies that assess and certify projects, including Verra and Gold Standard. Some carbon credit marketplaces, Earthly for example, will add another layer of quality control with their own independent assessments.

How are businesses approaching carbon offsetting?

Businesses are recognising that they have a responsibility to address their carbon impact and can contribute to the fight against climate change and biodiversity loss. Carbon offsetting can be a way for businesses to take accountability for their emissions, as well as to invest in projects that reduce or remove carbon from the atmosphere alongside supporting nature and local communities.

Alongside emission reduction strategies, some businesses are setting carbon neutral targets. This involves calculating the total emissions of operations or a particular activity or product, then purchasing carbon credits from verified projects that are designed to reduce or remove an equivalent amount of carbon from the atmosphere.

A net zero target involves the same process, but with a more developed reduction strategy in place and the capacity to offset other greenhouse gases in addition to carbon dioxide.

To maintain these certifications, annual carbon accounting and offsetting is required. Within these strategies, carbon credits and offsetting allows businesses to balance their emissions and work towards achieving their ESG targets.

Overall, businesses are taking a variety of approaches to carbon offsetting. The effectiveness of these approaches will depend on factors such as the types of projects being supported, the rigour of verification and monitoring, and the overall commitment of businesses to addressing their carbon impact.

>> Speak to our experts about your sustainability strategy.

Peatland biodiversity
New mangroves planted

What could be the challenges or limitations of carbon offsetting?

1. Not a substitute for emission reductions: While offsetting can complement sustainability strategies, it is not a replacement for reducing emissions at the source. Relying heavily on offsets may delay necessary operational changes, perpetuating the very practices that contribute to climate change.

2. Quality and credibility of offsetting projects: As an emerging sector, not all offset projects are effective or ethically sound. Some may fail to deliver promised emissions reductions or have negative social or environmental consequences. At Earthly, it’s our role to identify the highest-integrity, lowest-risk projects that support people and biodiversity alongside removing carbon.

3. The issue of additionality: A core principle of offsetting is additionality - the idea that a project’s emissions reductions would not have occurred without the offset investment. Proving additionality can be challenging, as it requires a clear understanding of what would have happened without the project. Projects that fail this test offer little real impact.

4. Permanence challenges: The permanence of carbon storage is another concern. For example, reforestation projects may lose their effectiveness if forests are later destroyed by logging, fire, or other environmental factors. This undermines the long-term credibility of the offsets and complicates emissions accounting.

5. Risk of greenwashing: Greenwashing can happen when an organisation is vague or misleading in their claims, e.g. “the greenest way to travel” or where businesses are promoting their carbon offsetting but not committing to a reduction plan.

There are a few actions companies can take to prevent making false claims: 

  1. Be transparent about your environmental impact and any trade-offs.

  2. Back up any environmental claims with third-party certifications or verifications.

  3. Don't exaggerate or make misleading claims about the environmental benefits of your products or services.

  4. Continuously strive to improve your company's environmental performance rather than relying on greenwashing as a one-time solution.

6. Inefficiencies and lack of transparency: Critics argue that a significant portion of funds for offsetting goes towards administration rather than actual emissions reductions. Sourcing credits from reputable providers with transparent reporting and independent verification is essential to ensure value.

What are the clear benefits of carbon offsetting?

1. Reducing a carbon footprint: Carbon offsetting enables businesses to compensate for their unavoidable carbon emissions. By investing in projects that remove or reduce greenhouse gases, companies can lower their overall carbon footprint and move closer to achieving (or going beyond!) net zero targets. This is particularly useful for emissions that cannot yet be eliminated through operational changes.

2. Meeting sustainability goals: For companies with ambitious environmental targets, offsetting provides a way to bridge the gap between current emissions and desired reductions. It demonstrates a commitment to addressing climate change, satisfying investors, customers and stakeholders who increasingly prioritise environmental responsibility.

3. Supporting environmental and social projects: Many carbon offset initiatives go beyond reducing emissions. Projects like reforestation, peatland protection or agroforestry offer co-benefits such as biodiversity conservation, water management, food security and employment opportunities for local communities. By investing in these projects, businesses can make a positive impact beyond their own operations.

4. Enhancing corporate reputation and legacy: Engaging in credible carbon offset programmes can strengthen a company’s reputation. As consumers and investors increasingly favour environmentally conscious businesses, offsetting can serve as a visible indicator of sustainability efforts, fostering goodwill and competitive advantage.

Grasslands biodiversity
Forest trees biodiversity

Earthly's position on carbon offsetting

At Earthly, we prioritise putting nature at the centre of everything we do and every project we support. We want to help organisations understand their carbon footprint and how they can reduce it and mitigate it through nature-based solutions.

Investing in nature-based solutions is a key initiative all businesses can employ to help reduce the effects of climate change and biodiversity loss. In fact, “nature-based solutions can contribute to 37% of the climate mitigation needed by 2030”. Unlike traditional carbon credits, which are priced as low as $0.39 per tonne, nature-based solutions take into account the social costs and other factors contributing to climate change. This approach will lead to more meaningful and sustainable results for people, carbon and biodiversity.

Overall, our stance is clear: while carbon offsetting can be a useful tool for businesses to reduce their carbon footprint (especially in the short term), it is not a replacement for reducing emissions at the source. We would also add that we always encourage organisation to ‘go beyond’ net zero and offset at least 110% of their footprint or unavoidable emissions. This ‘beyond value chain mitigation’ is what is required to truly move the needle on climate change.

>> Speak to our experts about carbon credits for your business.

A balanced approach to carbon offsetting

While carbon offsetting is proven to be an essential tool, it should be part of a broader sustainability strategy. Experts agree that companies must prioritise reducing emissions at their source - through energy efficiency, renewable energy adoption and supply chain improvements - before turning to offsets for unavoidable emissions. The general guideline is to reduce emissions by at least 90% and use offsets only for the remainder.

Additionally, businesses should select offset projects with high standards of verification. These certifications help ensure that the projects are delivering measurable, permanent and additional emissions reductions while also considering potential co-benefits for communities and ecosystems.

Carbon offsetting can play a valuable role in achieving corporate sustainability goals, provided it is used responsibly. By investing in high-quality projects and prioritising emission reductions within their operations, businesses can balance the need for immediate action with the long-term transition to a low-carbon economy. The key is to view offsetting as a complementary measure - not a standalone solution - on the path to net zero and beyond.

Kelp

Get in touch with Earthly's team of experts or find out more about working with Earthly.